Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Pena

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 29, 1994No. 93-1505PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

44 F.3d 437

63 USLW 2425, 2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 814

The ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY,

Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Consolidated Rail

Corporation, CSX Transportation, Inc., Illinois Central

Railroad Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk

& Western Railway Company, Southern Pacific Transportation

Company, and Union Pacific Railroad Company, Petitioners,

v.

Federico PENA, Secretary of Transportation, et al., Respondents,

and

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and United

Transportation Union, Intervening Respondents.

Nos. 93-1505, 93-2378, and 93-2712.

United States…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Holland, Michael H. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center for Women v. KnollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. National Indian Gaming CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Charles L. Degmetich, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API