In Re Kirchner
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ROBERT D. MARTIN, Chief Judge.
In his dissent to Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992), Justice Scalia stated that he had “the greatest sympathy for the Courts of Appeals who must predict which manner of statutory construction we shall use for the next Bankruptcy Code case.” Id. at 435, 112 S.Ct. at 787 (Scalia, J., dissenting). I hope that Justice Scalia’s sympathy extends to bankruptcy courts. This case appears to involve the reconciliation of three Supreme Court precedents 1 and the language of the Bankruptcy Code.
A recent law review article…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In re ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- In Re Joseph and Sandra Schaitz, Debtors. Appeal of Gwenn L. Webb and Colton WebbCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re DonahueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1998
- In Re DonahueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1998
- Monroe v. Seaway Bank & Trust Co. (In re Monroe)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. 203 North LaSalle Street PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. 203 North LaSalle Street PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1999