Legal Opinion

In Re Donahue

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont

Decided June 1, 1998No. 19-10074PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CONFIRMING CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND DENYING RELIEF FROM STAY

FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge.

We are charged with 1 the apparently simple matter of deciding the confirmability of Debtor’s plan, but upon close examination, find confusion and doubt with regard to many aspects of existing law. Creditor raises several chapter 13 confirmation issues, and, after addressing each in turn, we hold that 1) Debtor is entitled to cure Creditor’s claim; 2) Debtor may modify Creditor’s rights under the plan; and 3) cause exists to extend the length of the plan to 60 months.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re FriesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. In Re Sharon E. Kerwin, Debtor, First Brandon National Bank v. Sharon E. Kerwin, Jan M. Sensenich, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. In Re MorphisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WagnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
  2. In Re LopezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  3. In re KeokukUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  4. In re HurdUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API