Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Seaway Bank & Trust Co. (In re Monroe)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 25, 2014No. Bankruptcy No. 13-24570-GMH; Adversary No. 13-02747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

G. MICHAEL HALFENGER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Seaway Bank & Trust Company hold claims that are secured by junior mortgages encumbering the principal residence of chapter 13 debtors Mark and Sharon Monroe. The Monroes allege — and no one contests — that they owe more to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which holds the senior mortgage encumbering their residence, than their residence is worth. The Monroes seek a judgment declaring that (i) HUD’s and Seaway’s claims are “unsecured,” as that term is defined in 11 U.S.C. § 506(a), and (ii)…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re RanieriUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Goodwyn v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
  3. Phifer v. City of Milwaukee (In re Phifer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API