Loreto v. Procter & Gamble Co.

DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 29)

TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.

This civil action is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Doe. 29) filed by Defendant, the Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”). P & G contends that the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. 22) (the “Complaint”) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. P & G’s position is that Plaintiffs assert claims under the Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 301, et seq. (“FDCA”) for which no private right of action exists. Alternatively, P & G argues that Plaintiffs…