Legal Opinion

Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1993No. 1574PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

This appeal asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in denying Joseph Pietropaolo’s petition to open a default judgment. The trial court did not accept as reasonable appellant’s excuse for the delay in filing an answer to appellee’s complaint. The trial court, however, did not weigh the equities presented by the circumstances in this case nor balance the prejudice to the two sides, as the relevant case law requires. Thus, we hold that the trial court erred in refusing to open the default judgment, and reverse.

*254We preface our reasoning with this summary of the pertinent…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Shainline v. Alberti Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. US Bank N.A. v. MallorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Myers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Castings Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Seeger v. First Union National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Atlantic Credit & Finance, Inc. v. GiulianaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API