Legal Opinion

Stabley v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 2014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (“A & P”) and Pathmark Stores, Inc. (“Pathmark”) (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal the trial court’s order denying their petition to open the default judgment entered in favor of Bertha Stabley and against Appellants. We affirm.

The underlying claim arose when Stab-ley was struck by a column of shopping carts in a Pathmark parking lot, which were being pushed by a Pathmark employee. Trial Court Opinion (“T.C.O.”), 8/5/2013, at 1. The trial court set forth the materially undisputed procedural history as follows:

This case originated…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Castings Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gordon, T. v. Herman, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Harleysville Mutual Ins. Co. v. Solomon, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Loncar, D. v. Curry, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. McCarthy, J. v. Riddell, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Scalla, E. v. KWS, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API