Legal Opinion

United States v. Van Alstyne

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2009No. 07-50105PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Lance Van Alstyne appeals his conviction for money laundering and the sentence imposed by the district court following a limited remand. After Van Alstyne filed his appeal to this court but before briefing, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Santos, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 170 L.Ed.2d 912 (2008), which addressed — with less than clear results, as will appear — the meaning of the money laundering statute.

Van Alstyne now argues that Santos requires us to reverse his money laundering conviction. We agree in part. We hold that Santos undermines our earlier approach…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. People v. GutmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  4. United States v. CrosgroveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. Garland v. RoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API