Garland v. Roy
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS, Circuit Judge:
Pro se petitioner Gene Irving Garland appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In that petition he argues that he is entitled to release in light of United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 170 L.Ed.2d 912 (2008), which held that the money-laundering statute’s, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1), term “proceeds” was ambiguous and as a result, in certain circumstances, must be read to mean “profits.” Santos clearly applies retroactively to Garland’s convictions at issue in this case. United States v. McPhail, 112 F.3d…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Wooten v. CauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- People v. GutmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. RubashkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Gregory Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.