Legal Opinion
United States v. Crosgrove
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 18, 2011No. 08-4650PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Darrell Crosgrove appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). Crosgrove argues that the Government did not present sufficient evidence at trial to support either conviction. Because there was sufficient evidence of a conspiracy to commit mail/wire fraud, Crosgrove’s conviction for that count must be affirmed. However, the Government did not produce sufficient evidence at trial to support the conspiracy to commit money…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Wooten v. CauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jose Escalante-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Melvin SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.