Legal Opinion
Rhode v. Becerra
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 17, 2018No. Case No.: 18-cv-802-BENPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs set out nine claims for relief in an Amended Complaint ("Complaint"). Defendant Xavier Becerra filed a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss three of those claims: Claim 1 alleging a violation of U.S. Const. Art, I, § 8, Clause 3 (the "Commerce Clause"), Claim 8 alleging a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, and Claim 9 alleging federal preemption. This motion to dismiss does not address the Plaintiffs' other six claims alleging violations of the Second Amendment. Defendant also asks the Court to take…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.