State v. Glick
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for robbery in the third degree and assault in the fourth degree. He contends that the trial judge erred in denying his motions for a mistrial. The dispositive issue is whether the trial judge had discretion to deny the motions. We conclude that as a matter of law he did not. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Defendant was brought into the courtroom for a jury trial wearing handcuffs and a belly chain. The trial judge conducted an in camera inquiry as to the reason for the restraints. The prosecutor told the judge that he had requested Deputy…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. StillingOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- State v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. MerrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.