Legal Opinion
Isereau v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided November 3, 1954No. Claim No. 31927; Claim No. 31936; Claim No. 31928; Claim No. 31929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lambíase, J.
In the first two above set forth claims movant has moved (1) for an order excusing the claimant’s failure to serve a copy of the afore-mentioned claim upon the Attorney-General of the State of New York; or (2) for an order permitting the claimant to serve such claim upon the Attorney-General; and (3) for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and proper. In the last two above set forth claims movant has moved only for the relief set forth at two and three above. The State of New York has filed and served no answering papers and has made no cross motion.
All…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Skakandy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Skakandy v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Siegel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Enstrom v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- McMahon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jeffes v. BarnesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Bonaparte v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Foyster v. Tutuska, New York County Courts1964
- New York Telephone Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1986