New York Telephone Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
This motion gives us the opportunity to address a vexatious clause in the Court of Claims Act whose recent repeal will save the Bar much confusion.
Claimant, New York Telephone Company (New York Tel.), *931seeks leave to file a late claim. (Court of Claims Act § 10 [6].) The alleged cause of action involves property damage to its underground cables occurring on June 27, 1984. A notice of intention was filed with this court on September 12, 1984, within the statutorily prescribed 90-day period. (Court of Claims Act § 10 [3].) However, service was not made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Petronis v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939
- Isereau v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
- Garr v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
- Walker v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bonaparte v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991