Legal Opinion

New York Telephone Co. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided August 8, 1986No. Motion No. M-34764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard M. Weisberg, J.

This motion gives us the opportunity to address a vexatious clause in the Court of Claims Act whose recent repeal will save the Bar much confusion.

Claimant, New York Telephone Company (New York Tel.), *931seeks leave to file a late claim. (Court of Claims Act § 10 [6].) The alleged cause of action involves property damage to its underground cables occurring on June 27, 1984. A notice of intention was filed with this court on September 12, 1984, within the statutorily prescribed 90-day period. (Court of Claims Act § 10 [3].) However, service was not made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Petronis v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939
  3. Isereau v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Garr v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Walker v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bonaparte v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API