Legal Opinion

People v. Blake

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1933No. Docket No. 1656PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. This appeal is from the judgment upon the verdict and from an order of the court denying a motion for a new trial.

The evidence in support of the verdict is briefly and fairly epitomized in respondent’s brief as follows:

“One Alexander Morgan "was a fish peddler and on the morning of November 24, 1931, was proceeding from the city of Santa Cruz towards the city of Capitola ... As he approached the residence of some Japanese people by the name of Kitahara he passed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Ye FooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. People v. ArkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. Fong SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Coryell v. Clifford F. Reid, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. PieroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BumbaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. NudoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. OronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API