Legal Opinion

People v. Ark

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1892No. 20919PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

— The appellant was convicted of murder, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for life. A motion for a new trial was made and denied, and from the order denying the motion, and from the judgment, the defendant has appealed.

The appellant’s chief contention is, that the court abused its discretion in overruling the defendant’s challenge for actual bias, made to several of the persons who were examined as to their qualifications to serve as jurors. Section 1170 of the Penal Code does not provide for an exception to a challenge for actual bias, and it has been held here in several…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Attorney General of CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Telegraph Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Keefe v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State ex inf. Crow v. Firemen's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State v. KapelinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API