Legal Opinion

People v. Nudo

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1940No. Crim. 1710PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

The defendant was convicted after trial by jury in the county of Stanislaus, of the crime of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, a felony. He objected to the court of its own motion referring the matter to the probation officer, and was sentenced to one year in the county jail. This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying a new trial.

The information by which defendant was charged is as follows:

“Information for assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, a felony. Louis Nudo is accused by the District Attorney…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. PeralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. FuquaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. People v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. DewsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. McCaffreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. People v. ScoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. RothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API