Legal Opinion
Wesselman v. Engel Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 1955PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
Defendants-appellants challenge only the deficiency provisions of the judgment entered against them in this foreclosure action. The facts are sufficiently outlined in the opinion of Judge Dye, with which we agree excepting as to the liability of the appellant estate for taxes and assessments (and interest thereon) totaling $24,442.40, under George C. Engel’s guarantee.
The brief, unacknowledged guarantee on which respondents rely was typewritten on the hack of the extension agreement dated October 14, 1922. By its provisions, George 0. Engel, who died in 1936, guaranteed ‘1 payment of [1]…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- White v. WielandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Central Hanover Bank v. Roslyn Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- White v. WielandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Getman v. NiferopulosNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Roslyn Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- White Rose Food v. SalehNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Flemington National Bank & Trust Co. v. Domler Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- United States v. Bedford AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- F. M. A. Financial Corp. v. Build, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
- 665-75 Eleventh Avenue Realty Corp. v. SchlangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.