Legal Opinion
White Rose Food v. Saleh
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 2003PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. The certified question should not be answered as the Appellate Division order is final and thus the certified question is unnecessary.
On September 30, 1994, JMS Food Corp., owned by appellant’s brother, Samir Saleh, gave a promissory note to respondents whereby JMS agreed to pay an existing debt of $305,430. The note was secured by an interest in various property items of JMS. In their individual capacities, appellant and Samir Saleh both guaranteed the note. In March 1996, JMS defaulted and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Uribe v. MERCHS. BANK OF NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Gateway State Bank v. Shangri-La Private Club for Women, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Gateway State Bank v. Shangri-La Private Club for Women, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Page v. . KrekeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Bier Pension Plan Trust v. Estate of SchneiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Banco Popular North America v. LiebermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Lo-Ho LLC v. BatistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Davimos v. HalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ochs v. HindmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- AXA Investment Managers UK Ltd. v. Endeavor Capital Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.