Legal Opinion

United States v. Bedford Associates

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 24, 1980No. 79 Civ. 1522 (HFW), 79 Civ. 1482 (HFW)PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WERKER, District Judge.

These two consolidated actions arise from the Internal Revenue Service’s (the “IRS”) occupancy of a 21-story office building located at 120 Church Street owned by the defendant Bedford Associates. 1 The plaintiff-intervenor Bowery Savings Bank (“Bowery”) is the holder of a consolidated first mortgage on the premises. These actions having been tried on the merits before the Court on March 17-20 and 24-26, 1980, and all of the evidence having been duly considered, judgment is rendered in favor of Bedford in action no. 79 Civ. 1522 and in favor of Bowery in action…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. George Backer Management Corp. v. Acme Quilting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Eden AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. United States v. Afram Lines (USA), Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Hotel Syracuse Inc. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency (In Re Hotel Syracuse Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1993
  4. Shamrock Holdings, Inc. v. Polaroid Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1989
  5. New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API