Legal Opinion
Knickerbocker Ex Rel. Estate of Knickerbocker v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 16, 1990No. 89-CV-73601-DTPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
On January 2, 1990, the court entered an order remanding this case to state court because defendant Jonick’s removal notice was defective. The matter is presently before the court on defendants’ January 10, 1990, motions for reconsideration.
Local Court Rule 17(m)(3) states: Generally, ... motions for rehearing or reconsideration which merely present the same issues ruled upon by the Court ... shall not be granted. The movant shall not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the Court and the parties have been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Albonetti v. GAF Corporation-Chemical GroupDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
- Mason v. International Business MacHines, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1982
- Fellhauer v. City of GenevaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Clyde v. National Data Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1985
- Colin K. v. SchmidtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ogletree v. BarnesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Production Stamping Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Henderson v. HolmesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Spillers v. TillmanDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
- In Re Nat. Century Fin. Enterpr., Inc., Inv. Lit.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.