Legal Opinion
United States v. Miller
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 19, 1962No. Crim. No. 14413PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
This case grows out of a nineteen-count indictment charging violations of the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341. The defendants have now made three motions: (1) for a Bill of Particulars; (2) To Dismiss the Indictment or to Strike Clauses or Counts; (3) To Require the Government to Designate Collateral Transactions. For the reasons set out below all three motions will be denied.
The essence of the scheme as alleged is eight misrepresentations, set out in the first paragraph of Count One, and the nondisclosure of three material facts, set out in paragraph 2 of Count
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Harding L. Cacy, Daniel W. Campbell, Bart Grant and Sherwin J. Shoen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. GreveDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Thomas E. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. PiperDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1964
- United States v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- United States v. ThevisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
- United States v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.