Legal Opinion
U. S. A. v. Elife
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1967No. 66 Cr. 466PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 7(f), F.R.Crim.P., defendant moves for a bill of particulars. The Government consents in substance to items 1, 2(b), 4 and 6. It asserts it. does not have knowledge of the information sought by item 2(b), and accordingly, it will so state.
Items 3 and 5 are in dispute. Item 3 is denied. We do not regard knowledge of the acts of defendant with respect to the carton allegedly stolen as being necessary to the preparation of defendant’s defense. The government is not required to reveal the details of its case unnecessarily. See e. g., United States v. Smith,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- United States v. Edwin MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
- United States v. Sylvester J. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. BarberDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
- United States v. BarberDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.