Legal Opinion

Heimer v. Privratsky

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1989No. Civ. 880081PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Nadine Heimer brought this negligence action against R.A. Privratsky, a licensed optometrist, R.A. Privratsky, O.D., Ltd., a North Dakota corporation, and Joan Sailer, an employee of the corporation. We reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

In her complaint Heimer alleges that on December 5, 1984, she sought the services of the defendants, ostensibly for the purpose of being fitted for contact lenses. The complaint further alleges:

“VII.
“That on or about December 5, 1984, Defendant, R.A. Privratsky, O.D., negligently permitted or caused a toxic…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lanier v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Winkjer v. HerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hestbeck v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Kirton v. Williams Electric Cooperative, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. White v. Altru Health SystemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Larsen v. ZarrettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rawlings v. FruhwirthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Van Klootwyk v. Baptist Home, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Larson v. HetlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API