Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Wells

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1916No. 6897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from .Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judges Action by Ábbie Wells against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WILSON, C.

This is an action instituted by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by her by reason of having been left at defendant’s railway station while a passenger of defendant railway company from Erick, Okla., to Hot Springs, Ark. The evidence offered by the plaintiff in support of the allegations of her petition was substantially as follows: With the purpose of becoming a passenger from Erick, Okla., to Hot Springs, Ark.-, and afterwards returning over the route of defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Rhyne v. TurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. FreelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aaronson v. PeytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Hancock v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Rawlins v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. VosburgSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API