Legal Opinion

St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Freeland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1913No. 2903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Rogers County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by Ethel A. Freeland against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

This was an action by Ethel A. Freeland against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Rail way Company, to recover damages for being misinformed as to the point where she should leave the train on the defendant’s road, and for being permitted to alight at Recks, Okla., instead of Claremore. The evidence upon the part of the plaintiff shows that when the train reached Recks the auditor of the defendant company told her that that was the place for her to leave the train, and that he picked up her hand baggage and carried it out, she following. It also shows that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Rhyne v. TurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. A. T. S. F. R. R. Co. v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. BaldreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. White v. BK Trucking Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. VosburgSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API