Legal Opinion

Wells v. . Crumpler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is prosecuted by one of the defendants, B. F. King, Jr., from a judgment for plaintiffs in two cases which were consolidated and tried together by consent of counsel and order of the court.

The two cases were brought by the above-named plaintiffs, one against W. B. Crumpler and Ira Scott, partners trading as Crumpler Scott, and B. F. King, Jr., and D. R. Foster, and the other by the same plaintiffs against Godfrey Hart, D. R. Foster, and B. F. King, Jr.

The purpose of both actions was the same, and was to have the court declare that the plaintiffs were the owners and entitled to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Gudger v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Matthews v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Faw v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Hare v. . WeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Bell v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Wilmington Furniture Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API