Poole v. Incentives Unlimited, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STILWELL, Judge:
The issue addressed in this appeal is whether a covenant not to compete is enforceable when entered into during an at-will employment relationship and the only “benefit” to the employee is that the employee is not terminated. While other cases have tangentially addressed the issue, this is the first time it has been so squarely presented to an appellate court in this state. The trial court held that a covenant not to compete entered into under these circumstances is unenforceable for lack of consideration. We agree and affirm.
FACTS
Carol C. Poole began working as a travel agent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Maintenance Specialties, Inc. v. GottusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Martin v. Credit Protection Ass'n, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Standard Register Co. v. KerriganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Piano v. Premier Distributing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Poole v. Incentives Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Anthony v. Atlantic Group, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Summits 7, Inc. v. KellySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Mona Electric Group, Inc. v. Truland Service Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.