Legal Opinion

Summits 7, Inc. v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 19, 2005No. 04-242PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

¶ 1. (Ret.), Specially Assigned. Defendant Staci Lasker* appeals the superior court’s order enjoining her from working for a competitor of her former employer, plaintiff Summits 7, Inc., based on the terms of a noncompetition agreement entered into by the parties during Lasker’s at-will employment with Summits 7. The principal issue in dispute is whether there was sufficient consideration to support the agreement. The superior court ruled that either Lasker’s continued employment or the promotions and increased pay she received during her employment with Summits 7 was sufficient consideration…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Curtis 1000, Incorporated v. Roy H. Suess and American Business Forms, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Travel Masters, Inc. v. Star Tours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. NBZ, INC. v. PilarskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. Mattison v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Innovation Ventures v. Liquid ManufacturingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. David FriedlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. HornerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Concepts NREC, LLC v. QiuDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025
  5. Encore Holdings v. GadhueVermont Superior Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API