Legal Opinion
Roof Depot, Inc. v. Ohman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 2002No. C5-01-1112PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent, arguing that the district court erred by concluding that (1) her lien on defendant’s shares of stock was invalid and unenforceable and (2) respondent was not estopped from enforcing the stock-transfer restrictions. Because the district court did not err, we affirm.
FACTS
The facts in this case are undisputed. Respondent Roof Depot, Inc., is a closely held Minnesota corporation. Defendant Daniel Ohman is the former president of Roof Depot and the former husband of appellant Joan…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Vacura v. Haar's Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Castonguay v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pecora v. BerlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011