Sykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
In this case plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their complaint with prejudice which in effect terminated their cause of action and barred any attempts at amendment. The dismissal was based on a demurrer which was properly sustained. However, on the state of the record, the action barring further attempts at amendment was prematurely taken by the court below.
*71On November 13, 1972, plaintiffs, Minnie and Milton Sykes, commenced an action in assumpsit against defendant, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. Their complaint alleged that on July 27, 1967,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Gardiner v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Wilson v. Howard Johns RestaurantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Bellotti v. SpaederSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Delhi-Warnock Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Boyle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Murray v. University of Pennsylvania HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Toombs, Harold T. v. Manning, Sylvester, Brown, James, and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Dash v. Wilap Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.