Toombs, Harold T. v. Manning, Sylvester, Brown, James, and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Senior Circuit Judge:
The primary issue we confront on this appeal is whether the defendant, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), is a Commonwealth party within the ambit of the sovereign immunity statute enacted by the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 1978. Both the plaintiff, Harold T. Toombs, and the defendants (SEPTA and two of its employees) appeal from a district court judgment of $284,-314.64 in favor of Toombs, 640 F.Supp. 938.
Toombs contends that the district court erred when, in accordance with the 1978 limited immunity statute,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Christy v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.