Legal Opinion
People v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 18, 1971No. Crim. 8996PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction 1 entered on a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of two- separate counts of possessing and selling restricted dangerous drugs (Health & Saf. Code, § § 11911, 11912). Viewing the evidence most strongly in favor of the judgment, the record discloses the following pertinent facts as they relate to the first count of which defendant was convicted.
On September 26, 1968, Katie Oatis, 18, Ricky Vigno, 17, and Richard Yeager, drove to San Francisco for the purpose of purchasing methedrine (“speed”), a dangerous and restricted drug.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. RatliffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- People v. PijalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. CagleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.