Legal Opinion
People v. Pijal
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1973No. Crim. 10470PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Defendant Ashton Pijal appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawfully furnishing and selling a restricted dangerous drug in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11912.
The pertinent facts may be summarized as follows: On May 19, 1971, San Francisco Police Officer Moroschok (“Moroschok”) was working as an undercover narcotic agent attempting to make buys of narcotics and/or dangerous drugs. He was accompanied by a police informant, named Dotty, who had been introduced to him by his supervisor, Officer Hendahl. At…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. RubioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. Van AlstyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.