Enid City Ry. Co. v. Webber
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court„ Garfield County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by Frank Webber against the Enid City Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROSSER, C.
This is an action by Frank Web-ber against the Enid City Railway Company, a corporation, for personal injuries. The plaintiff in error will be referred to as the company, and the defendant in error as plaintiff. Plaintiff was employed by the railway company as an inspector at its car barn, and seems to have performed a number of miscellaneous duties for the company. Among other things, it was his duty (or at least he frequently performed the service) to bring the employees of the company to- the public square of the city of Enid at the close of their labors at midnight,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Jones v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Sans Bois Coal Co. v. JanewaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Colonial Refining Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Littlejohn v. Midland Valley R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Anthony v. BlissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.