Connolly v. Bruner
West Virginia Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, Tyler County. Action by James Connolly and others against Andrew Bruner. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
McWhorter, Judge:
This is an action of trespass on the ease in assumpsit brought on the 8th day of December, 1893, in the circuit court of. Tyler County, by James Connolly, Peter A. Connolly, D. E. Connolly, H. J. Connolly, William H. Johnson, Walter H. Johnson, E. T. Johnson, C. M. Earrer, and John Trefts, partners as Connolly & Johnson, against Andrew Bruner, in which plaintiffs filed their declaration at the January rules, 1894, containing only the common counts, and laying their damages at one thousand five hundred dollars. At February rules defendant appeared, and demurred generally to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. BurnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hansbrough v. Neal, Featherston & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Pleasants v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1828
- Kilgore v. BulkleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1841
- White v. RomansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ryder-Gougar Co. v. GarretsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- McCurdy v. Alaska & Chicago Commercial Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902