Fish v. Crawford Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Jobn Fish against the Crawford Manufacturing Company for work and labor. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Plaintiff is a lumber inspector. On the 26th of September, 1895, the defendant sold to one Adam Schillo, of Chicago, a quantity of lumber on dock at Menominee. The agreement for sale was silent as to the inspection. The plaintiff inspected the lumber by direction from Schillo, as he (Schillo) testified, after an agreement between the defendant and himself that plaintiff should tally the lumber. The defendant’s officers saw the plaintiff at work inspecting, and permitted him to go on, and finish the work, and afterwards paid him one-half of his charges. The plaintiff claims that by a local…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Harrison v. BirrellOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Cleveland v. BatemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- Davis v. WhitsettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Gilbert v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ryder-Gougar Co. v. GarretsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.