Legal Opinion
Baldock v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 22, 1932No. Docket No. 8475PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff was struck and injured by a bicycle ridden by defendant Perez, who was an employee of defendant corporation. The jury returned a verdict in her favor for the sum of $1750. Defendants moved for a directed verdict upon the grounds that there was no evidence of negligence on their part and that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence in failing to look in the direction from which the bicycle was approaching. This motion was denied, and later a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was made. The last motion was also denied, and defendants have appealed from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Nickell v. RosenfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bamber v. BelprezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Grant v. RyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Overacker v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936