Legal Opinion

State v. Bruno

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1927No. 4489PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

The information filed in this action charges the defendant with being a persistent violator of an act prohibiting the manufacture and use of intoxicating liquors. Comp. Laws Utah 1917, § 3343, and section 3345, as amended by chapter 10, Laws of Utah 1925. A trial to a jury resulted in a verdict of guilty of the offense charged. Defendant moved for a new trial, which motion was denied, and she was sentenced to serve an indeterminate term in the state prison. She appeals.

Defendant relies upon two assignments of error for a reversal of the judgment, namely:

1. The court gave the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McWhorter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Lockmiller v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. State v. AimeUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Taylor v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. HolderIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. SbernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Johnston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API