Legal Opinion

People v. McDonald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1925No. Docket No. 137PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Defendant reviews his conviction and sentence, on a charge of having intoxicating liquor in his possession, by writ of error. The charge was laid in the complaint, warrant and information as a second offense, and the sentence was imposed therefor (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 7079 [51]). No proof was offered on the examination had that defendant had been theretofore convicted of a similar offense.

The question first presented is whether, without such proof, an averment thereof may be made in the information and a conviction and sentence therefor sustained. The validity of the provision for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Underwood v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Ingalls v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. People Ex Rel. Cosgriff v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. In Re BrazelMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Barr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State v. BarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API