People v. McDonald
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
Defendant reviews his conviction and sentence, on a charge of having intoxicating liquor in his possession, by writ of error. The charge was laid in the complaint, warrant and information as a second offense, and the sentence was imposed therefor (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 7079 [51]). No proof was offered on the examination had that defendant had been theretofore convicted of a similar offense.
The question first presented is whether, without such proof, an averment thereof may be made in the information and a conviction and sentence therefor sustained. The validity of the provision for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Underwood v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Ingalls v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- People Ex Rel. Cosgriff v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
- In Re BrazelMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Barr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. BarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.