Legal Opinion

State v. Hurley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1987No. 6674PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

Darcy Dale Hurley (defendant) was convicted by a jury of seven counts armed robbery and one count aggravated assault. Hurley was sentenced under the enhancement provisions of A.R.S. § 13-604.02(A) 1 because the trial court determined that he was on release from confinement when he committed the offenses. Hurley contends that § 13-604.02(A) is unconstitutional unless interpreted to require proof beyond a reasonable doubt and trial to a jury, rather than a judge, to determine release status. He also contends that his sentence—three consecutive life terms—is…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. LandriganArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CarreonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. SlemmerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. EagleArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API