Legal Opinion
Bulk Carriers Corp. v. Kasmu Laeva Omanikud
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 1942PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
This petition is presented under Section 4 of the United States Arbitration Act of February 12, 1925, Title 9 U.S.C.A. § 4.
The petitioner is a member of a partnership doing business under the name of Kasmu Laeva Omanikud (O. Tiedemann) owners of the Estonia Steamship “Hildur” (hereinafter referred to as “Owners”).
On the 25th day of November, 1939, the Owners by a written charter party executed at New York, N. Y., agreed to let and Bulk Carriers Corporation, as time charterer (hereinafter referred to as Charterer), agreed to hire the said steamship for a period of three…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. v. Westchester Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Marine Transit Corp. v. DreyfusSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Maheu v. Reynolds & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Stathatos v. Arnold Bernstein S. S. Corp. The Maria StathatosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. the AnacondaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Standard Magnesium Corp. v. FuchsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Pas-Ebs v. Group Health, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.