Legal Opinion
Marine Transit Corp. v. Dreyfus
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 4, 1932No. 172PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
The petitioner, Marine Transit Corporation, entered into a written booking agreement with the respondents, Louis Dreyfus & Company, to furnish insurable canal tonnage for about 200,000 bushels of wheat, to be carried from Buffalo to New York. The contract provided that it should be “ subject to New York Produce Exchange Canal Grain Charter Party No. 1 as amended.” That charter party contained the • following provision as to disputes:
“All disputes arising under this contract to. be arbitrated before the Committee on Grain of the New York Produce Exchange whose decision shall be final and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The Robert W. ParsonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.