Legal Opinion

Murrieta Valley Unified School District v. County of Riverside

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1991No. E008066PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TIMLIN, J.

Facts

On November 28, 1989, the County of Riverside (County), by and through its board of supervisors, adopted Resolution No. 89-536 and certified Environmental Impact Report No. 217 (EIR No. 217), thus finalizing approval of Comprehensive General Plan Amendment No. 52, commonly known as the Southwest Area Community Plan or “SWAP,” which covers approximately 210,000 acres or 320 square miles in the southwest section of Riverside County.

Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21152, County filed a notice of determination on December 7, 1989. On January 5, 1990, the Murrieta…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ramos v. County of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Santiago County Water District v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Fundin v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Alameda County, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Waste Management v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Corona-Norco Unified School District v. City of CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. WOODWARD PARK HOMEOWNERS v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Western/California, Ltd. v. Dry Creek Joint Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API