Legal Opinion

Allen v. Barr

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 19, 1950No. 8245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOSCINSKI, District Judge.

Plaintiffs charge infringement of Patent No. 2,467,001, granted April 12, 1949, to plaintiff Perry E. Allen, for “Improvement of. Scuff Pads ¡for Automobile Fender,” on his application dated July S, 1947: they also charge defendants with infringement of their “No-Mar” trade-mark, and unfair competition relating to the patented device and trade-mark use, and demand injunction, 'accounting, and damages. Defendants deny validity or infringement of patent and trade-mark, they deny unfair competition, and, by counterclaim seek injunction and judgment for damages against…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Old Reading Brewery, Inc. v. Lebanon Valley Brewing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Robinson Aviation, Inc. v. Barry Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1952
  3. Rockwell Mfg. Co. v. Evans Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API