Legal Opinion
Matter of R., H. L.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The petitioner alleged its due incorporation, the necessary subscription to its capital stock, and the payment of the ten per cent required. It further averred its need of the land sought to be condemned for the purposes of its road, and an unsuccessful effort to agree with the land owner upon the damages to be paid. The latter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Niagara Falls & Whirlpool Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Rensselaer and Saratoga R.R. Co. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- In Re Rochester Water Commissioners to Acquire Lands of Rochester Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aronoff v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp. v. DunnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. City of LodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Matter of City of New York (Newport Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.