Legal Opinion

East Bay Municipal Utility District v. City of Lodi

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1932No. Docket No. 4313PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

While a rehearing was granted in this cause for the purpose of re-examining the question of damages, owing to the fact that some corrections should be made in the opinion heretofore filed herein, we think it is more convenient to discard our first opinion entirely and restate our views in full, following the general statement heretofore made in this cause.

The plaintiff had judgment in an eminent domain proceeding condemning the riparian rights of the defendants in and to the waters of the Mokelumne River, in so far as said rights pertain to the lands and premises described in the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. City and County of Denver v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Idaho-Western Railway Co. v. Columbia Conference of Evangelical Lutheran Augustana SynodIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Schultz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Graham v. City of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Ellena v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. County Sanitation District No. 2 v. AverillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. County of Amador v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API