Legal Opinion

State v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 2019No. A17-2039PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The jury found Stewart guilty, and the district court sentenced him to 132 months in prison based on a criminal-history score of two. Stewart appeals.

ISSUES

I. Is the record evidence sufficient to support Stewart's conviction?

II. Did the district court abuse its discretion by admitting Dr. Swenson's expert testimony about the cause of B.G.D.'s injuries?

III. Did the district court err in calculating Stewart's criminal-history score?

ANALYSIS

I. Sufficient evidence supports Stewart's conviction.

In reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. State v. PrtineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peo v. BergeronColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Peo v. BergeronColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State of Minnesota v. Tyler Gregory OpatzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State v. Darryl Nieves; State v. Michael CifelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API