Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this accelerated appeal is whether relief will lie in postconviction' relief proceedings for a pro se claim of ineffective assistance of counsel rendered by a suspended attorney whose only alleged act of legal representation consisted of advising a petitioner that he should waive the right to a preliminary hearing. The trial court held that no prejudicial error occurred because a fully licensed counsel represented petitioner at trial; therefore, any denial of the right to counsel at the preliminary hearing was harmless. We agree and decline to impose a per se rule that would…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KennyColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State v. J.R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. People v. KennyColorado Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API