State v. Allen
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The issue in this accelerated appeal is whether relief will lie in postconviction' relief proceedings for a pro se claim of ineffective assistance of counsel rendered by a suspended attorney whose only alleged act of legal representation consisted of advising a petitioner that he should waive the right to a preliminary hearing. The trial court held that no prejudicial error occurred because a fully licensed counsel represented petitioner at trial; therefore, any denial of the right to counsel at the preliminary hearing was harmless. We agree and decline to impose a per se rule that would…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. KennyColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. J.R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- People v. KennyColorado Court of Appeals · 2001