Legal Opinion

People v. Stuckrath

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1923No. Crim. No. 982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the crime of bigamy, from an order denying defendant’s motion for an arrest of judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The order denying the motion for an arrest of judgment is not appealable.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying a motion made by him to set aside the information, the general point being that he was not legally committed by a magistrate. The motion was made upon two grounds, the first of which was that appellant’s preliminary examination was not terminated as required by Penal Code,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BorenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Reynolds v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. MageeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Dahler v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. KelsoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. RenfroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Dotseth v. Justice Court, Tucson, Precinct No. OneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Weber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API